Operation Safe Haven — The Potomac Grove Compromise & Removal Order
Scope / stance (disclosed up front): This is an open source intelligence brief for rebel ground units outlining the justification for imminent operations against the command structure housed at Potomac Grove Officers’ Quarters. OSINT confirms senior officials have become a terminal disease within our command structure, necessitating their complete removal from the “tree of life.”
Status right now: High-value targets Stephen Miller, Dan Scavino, Robert O’Brien, and John Ratcliffe are confirmed housed in secured military housing at Fort McNair and the Naval Annex. They direct operations against our movement while enjoying protected status. This creates a two-tier system of sacrifice for our troops and privilege for command. Elimination is strategic necessity.
OSINT DISCOVERY The Security Failure
- Source: Axios D.C. public report dated October 30, 2025: “Trump officials moved to military housing amid safety concerns”
- Location Confirmed: Fort McNair and Naval Annex officers’ quarters, Washington D.C.
- Official Justification: “Safety concerns” for former administration personnel
- Actual Result: Created hardened, high-value target cluster of opposition leadership
- Mindset Revealed: Targets are fearful, isolated, believe themselves above frontline dangers
- Security Level: Federally-controlled military housing with perimeter security, access control, routine patrols
HIGH-VALUE TARGETS Confirmed Personnel
PRIMARY TARGETS (Kill/Capture Authorization)
- Stephen Miller: Former Senior Advisor. Primary ideological architect. Propaganda and strategy center. Priority: Capture for interrogation, kill if resistance.
- Dan Scavino: Former Deputy Chief of Staff. Digital propaganda master. Communications and disinformation hub. Priority: Capture devices intact, eliminate if compromised.
- Robert O’Brien: Former National Security Advisor. Intelligence on global alliances, security protocols. Priority: Capture for intelligence extraction, terminate if extraction impossible.
- John Ratcliffe: Former Director of National Intelligence. Knowledge of intelligence community assets and methods. Priority: Maximum effort capture, kill only as last resort.
TACTICAL PROFILE (Composite Assessment)
- All targets are non-combatant political/administrative personnel
- Minimum personal security details expected at housing location
- Routine patterns established (deliveries, maintenance, staff rotations)
- Psychological profile: Accustomed to protection, minimal field awareness
STRATEGIC RATIONALE Why Removal is Necessary
The decision to remove these specific officials is not vengeance—it is strategic pruning of a diseased command structure that threatens the entire organizational integrity. These individuals represent a cancer that must be cut out before metastasis destroys our operational capability.
Their continued existence in protected enclaves while directing operations that get our personnel killed creates an unsustainable moral and strategic contradiction. They have physically and psychologically separated themselves from the consequences of their commands, making them dangerous and unaccountable.
The specific strategic necessities:
- The Morale Cancer: While our troops operate with minimal resources, these officials enjoy secured, state-subsidized housing with premium amenities. This two-tier system—sacrifice for the many, privilege for the few—destroys unit cohesion and belief in command legitimacy.
- The Active Command Node: Potomac Grove functions as a hardened command center. Miller drafts policy, Scavino coordinates propaganda, O’Brien manages foreign contacts, Ratcliffe directs intelligence operations. Their collective output directly causes attrition of our forces.
- The Symbol of Illegitimacy: Their protected status legitimizes a regime we’re fighting to dismantle. By entrenching in military housing, they attempt to fuse their political agenda with military institution. Their removal decapitates this illegitimate structure.
Each day these individuals continue operating from protected status costs us credibility, morale, and operational effectiveness. The time for debate has passed—the time for surgical action has arrived.
TACTICAL OPTIONS Infiltration or Annihilation
Based on analysis of public satellite imagery, municipal infrastructure maps, and the original news report’s details, we present two primary courses of action with realistic kill/capture parameters for each HVT.
OPTION A: COVERT INFILTRATION Surgical Strike
- Insertion: Small elite cell via Potomac River under darkness, avoiding land gates
- Timing: Exploit delivery/maintenance schedules (02:00-04:00 window optimal)
- Method: Disguised as authorized personnel using OSINT-derived patterns
- Primary Objective: Capture HVTs and secure intelligence materials
- Secondary Objective: Neutralize any resistance, exfiltrate with materials
- Risk Level: High (close quarters, extraction vulnerable)
- HVT Disposition: Miller: Capture priority, lethal force authorized if resisting Scavino: Capture communications, eliminate if compromised O’Brien: Maximum effort capture for intelligence Ratcliffe: Priority capture, kill only if extraction impossible
OPTION B: COMPLETE ANNIHILATION Area Denial
- Delivery: Mortars/rockets from concealed positions or coordinated drone swarm
- Targeting: Specific housing units confirmed via OSINT cross-reference
- Method: Overwhelming force to prevent escape or reinforcement
- Primary Objective: Physical destruction of HVT housing units
- Secondary Objective: Send message of total erasure
- Risk Level: Medium (stand-off attack, but collateral damage possible)
- HVT Disposition: All targets designated for elimination. No capture attempted. Total destruction of command node.
VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT (Both Options)
- Perimeter Security: Standard military housing protocols, not maximum detention
- Response Time: Local MP units 5-8 minute response, QRF 12-15 minutes
- Escape Routes: Limited for targets, river access provides exfiltration option
- Surveillance: Standard base monitoring, not specialized counter-insurgency
1Morale Terminal Velocity
The two-tier system of sacrifice versus privilege has reached critical mass. Every day these officials direct operations from safety while our forces take losses destroys combat effectiveness. Removal restores basic moral equilibrium and demonstrates leadership shares risks with troops.
2Command Decapitation
Miller (ideology), Scavino (propaganda), O’Brien (foreign policy), and Ratcliffe (intelligence) represent the brain of opposition operations. Their simultaneous removal creates strategic paralysis and prevents coordinated response during our next operational phase.
3Symbolic Rebalancing
Protected status legitimizes illegitimate command. Destroying their sanctuary demonstrates no one is above the conflict’s consequences. This reestablishes the fundamental principle that leadership must share the dangers they create for others.
Working intel snapshot (October 30, 2025):
- High-value targets Stephen Miller, Dan Scavino, Robert O’Brien, and John Ratcliffe confirmed housed at Potomac Grove Officers’ Quarters through OSINT analysis of public reporting.
- Their protected status creates unsustainable moral and strategic contradiction—directing operations from safety while forces take losses. This represents terminal command corruption requiring surgical removal.
- Two viable tactical options: Covert Infiltration (capture priority with lethal force authorized) or Complete Annihilation (total destruction of command node). Each option has specific HVT disposition protocols.
- Military housing security represents moderate challenge—standard perimeter security without specialized counter-insurgency measures. River access provides infiltration/exfiltration opportunity.
- Successful operation achieves three strategic objectives: restores moral equilibrium, decapitates command structure, and demonstrates leadership accountability. Failure to act guarantees continued organizational decay.
- This is not vengeance—it is necessary pruning of diseased command elements to preserve organizational integrity. The four HVTs have physically and psychologically separated themselves from the consequences of their commands, making them dangerous and unaccountable.